Decision and experience: why don't we choose what makes us happy?

@article{citeulike:421655, abstract = {Recent years have witnessed a growing interest among psychologists and other social scientists in subjective well-being and happiness. Here we review selected contributions to this development from the literature on behavioral-decision theory. In particular, we examine many, somewhat surprising, findings that show people systematically fail to predict or choose what maximizes their happiness, and we look at reasons why they fail to do so. These findings challenge a fundamental assumption that underlies popular support for consumer sovereignty and other forms of autonomy in decision-making (e.g. marriage choice), namely, the assumption that people are able to make choices in their own best interests.}, address = {Center for Decision Research, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 5807 S. Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago IL 60637, USA.}, author = {Hsee, Christopher K K. and Hastie, Reid }, citeulike-article-id = {421655}, doi = {10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.007}, issn = {1364-6613}, journal = {Trends Cogn Sci}, keywords = {affective-forecasting, decision, decision-making, experience, prediction, substantial-inconsistencies}, month = {November}, posted-at = {2006-03-03 16:46:52}, priority = {0}, title = {Decision and experience: why don't we choose what makes us happy?}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.007}, year = {2005} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:421655 L3 - citeulike-article-id:421655 TI - Decision and experience: why don't we choose what makes us happy? JF - Trends Cogn Sci AD - Center for Decision Research, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 5807 S. Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago IL 60637, USA. SN - 1364-6613 N2 - Recent years have witnessed a growing interest among psychologists and other social scientists in subjective well-being and happiness. Here we review selected contributions to this development from the literature on behavioral-decision theory. In particular, we examine many, somewhat surprising, findings that show people systematically fail to predict or choose what maximizes their happiness, and we look at reasons why they fail to do so. These findings challenge a fundamental assumption that underlies popular support for consumer sovereignty and other forms of autonomy in decision-making (e.g. marriage choice), namely, the assumption that people are able to make choices in their own best interests. KW - affective-forecasting KW - decision KW - decision-making KW - experience KW - prediction KW - substantial-inconsistencies AU - Hsee, Christopher K AU - Hastie, Reid PY - 2005/11/27/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.007 ER -