| Registrati | Log in | FAQ | [?] |
Law and NeuroeconomicsSupreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 13, No. 1. (2005), pp. 35-62.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
There are no reviews of this article
Notes for this articleso la la
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
AbstractAs legal scholarship has come to rely more on economic analysis, the foundational questions of economics have become important questions for legal analysis as well. One of the key foundational elements of modern economics is the assumption of the rational utility maximizing individual. While this assumption has often been questioned, until recently, it was not possible to actually examine the brain mechanisms that individuals use to process the economic problems they face. As a result of the increasing abilities to explore the brain as individuals engage in economic activity, this article calls for a new approach to the study of law which incorporates the findings from the emerging area of neuroeconomics. We call this approach law and neuroeconomics. We argue that this re- search can help us understand what is occurring in the brains of individuals and the knowledge gained thereby can greatly aid both in understanding the process of creation and development of law as well as its effects on human behavior. The article discusses this research and begins the analysis of applying these findings to the study of law.
BibTeX record
RIS record