Registrati | Log in | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

On Spatial Gossip Algorithms for Average Consensus

by: Michael G Rabbat
Statistical Signal Processing, 2007. SSP '07. IEEE/SP 14th Workshop on (2007), pp. 705-709.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

This paper investigates the use of spatial gossip to compute the average consensus in networks such as grids or random geometric graphs, where connectivity is a function of proximity. Randomized gossip is a framework for distributed computation where, at each iteration, a random pair of nodes exchanges information, and then updates their local values by averaging. This simple protocol converges to an average consensus: every node obtains the average of the initial values across the network. In spatial gossip, if the distance between two nodes is d, then they communicate with probability proportional to d-ß for some ß ¿ 0. The special case ß = 0 corresponds to an algorithm known in the sensor network literature as geographic gossip. Dimakis et al. have shown that geographic gossip computes the average to accuracy n-1 in O(n3/2¿log n) transmissions. In this paper we show that the same rates are achieved for ß = 2 and ß = 3. Each setting offers a different balance between the rate of convergence (in gossip rounds) and the average number of transmissions per gossip round. We illustrate, via simulation, that spatial gossip with ß = 2 generally yields superior performance over geographic gossip by a constant factor.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.