Registrati | Log in | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Neural Activity in the Frontal Eye Fields Modulated by the Number of Alternatives in Target Choice

by: Kyoung-Min Lee, Edward L Keller
J. Neurosci., Vol. 28, No. 9. (27 February 2008), pp. 2242-2251.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Notes for this article

klouie has 0 private notes e 1 public note for this article.
  • Examination of FEF neurons during a free choice task showing that FEF activity is modulated by the number of alternative targets
  • Background includes a discussion of the finding that RTs increase as the number of alterntative targets increases (according to Hick's Law RT is a function of the log of the number of alternatives, see Hick 1952 ), which was shown by the authors previously to hold for saccadic eye movements ( Lee et al 2005 )
  • Such RT data is used to motivate the notion that the number of alternatives influences the choice process (not mentioned, but related is choice set size effects as in Iyengar and Lepper 2000 and Schwarz 2004 )
  • Task is a color-cued choice saccade task, with either 1, 2, or 4 colored alternatives which turn uniformly gray; color change of the central fixation target indicated appropriate later response (required memory of color-location association)
  • Authors designed task in an attempt to separate visual, cognitive (target selection), and motor processes
  • Neurons were classified as visual, visuomotor, or motor based on activity in a delayed-saccade task, consistenet with previous FEF studies
  • Behavioral results showed a monotonic increase in RT with increasing number of alternatives (NA): 251, 272, 284 ms; there were no significant difference in accuracy or peak velocities
  • 165 FEF neurons classified as 33 visual, 71 visuomotor, 36 motor and 25 not responsive
klouie (public ) - 2008-06-23 21:38:05

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

Selection of identical responses may not use the same neural mechanisms when the number of alternatives (NA) for the selection changes, as suggested by Hick's law. For elucidating the choice mechanisms, frontal eye field (FEF) neurons were monitored during a color-to-location choice saccade task as the number of potential targets was varied. Visual responses to alternative targets decreased as NA increased, whereas perisaccade activities increased with NA. These modulations of FEF activities seem closely related to the choice process because the activity enhancements coincided with the timing of target selection, and the neural modulation was greater as NA increased, features expected of neural correlates for a choice process from the perspective of Hick's law. Our current observations suggest two novel notions of FEF neuronal behavior that have not been reported previously: (1) cells called "phasic visual" that do not discharge in the perisaccade interval in a delayed-saccade paradigm show such activity in a choice response task at the time of the saccade; and (2) the activity in FEF visuomotor cells display an inverse relationship between perisaccadic activity and the time of saccade triggering with higher levels of activity leading to longer saccade reaction times. These findings support the area's involvement in sensory-motor translation for target selection through coactivation and competitive interaction of neural populations that code for alternative action sets. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3596-07.2008


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.