| Registrati | Log in | FAQ | [?] |
Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring.J Exp Psychol Gen, Vol. 135, No. 2. (May 2006), pp. 282-297.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
There are no reviews of this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
AbstractAlthough researchers are exploring animals' capacity for monitoring their states of uncertainty, the use of some paradigms allows the criticism that animals map avoidance responses to error-causing stimuli not because of uncertainty monitored but because of feedback signals and stimulus aversion. The authors addressed this criticism with an uncertainty-monitoring task in which participants completed blocks of trials with feedback deferred so that they could not associate reinforcement signals to particular stimuli or stimulus-response pairs. Humans and 1 of 2 monkeys were able to make cognitive, decisional uncertainty responses that were independent of feedback or reinforcement history within a task. This finding unifies the comparative literature on uncertainty monitoring. The dissociation of performance from reinforcement has theoretical implications, and the deferred-feedback technique has many applications.
BibTeX record
RIS record